04 · AI + analytics + GTM

Data-driven scaling
without the buzzword tax.

Most AI-and-analytics work doesn't pay for itself because it stops at the dashboard. We focus on the meter that matters — incremental revenue, reduced acquisition cost, faster conversion, retention bumps — and reverse-engineer the analytics, the model, the agent, and the experiment cadence from there. AI is a tool. Compound revenue is the metric.

Methodology

How strategic growth actually moves at SFHL.

  1. 01

    Outcome lock + revenue thesis

    We start with the financial outcome you want — incremental ARR, contribution margin, LTV uplift — and work backwards. If the data + model can't credibly move that meter, we say so and recommend you don't spend the budget. No-go is a valid outcome of the first conversation.

  2. 02

    Data audit + warehouse hygiene

    Most growth-analytics projects fail at the data layer, not the model layer. We audit what you have, fix the warehouse hygiene (event taxonomy, identity resolution, late-arriving data, dimensional modelling) before any model gets trained. Boring step, biggest leverage.

  3. 03

    Pick the right tool — model, agent, or rule

    Half the problems we see don't need ML. They need a deterministic rule engine and a dashboard. The other half need an LLM agent that can take action. The third half need a real model. We pick honestly. Most ROI comes from the cheap rules, not the expensive models.

  4. 04

    Build · deploy · instrument

    Local LLMs on Ollama where data sensitivity matters. Cloud LLMs for scale. Custom models on Python where the IP is the model. Every deployment ships with an instrumentation surface so the next iteration is data-driven, not vibes-driven.

  5. 05

    Experiment cadence + revenue review

    Quarterly revenue reviews tied to the meter we locked in step 1. Two-week experimentation cadence between reviews. We retain on this loop because it's where the compound value sits — the loop, not any one experiment.

In scope

What we ship inside this pillar.

Customer + revenue analytics

Cohort analysis, LTV modelling, attribution, churn forecasting. Built on top of your existing warehouse (Snowflake, BigQuery, ClickHouse, or PostgreSQL — we stack-fit, not stack-impose).

AI agents + automation

Customer-support agents, sales-research agents, internal-ops agents. Built on Claude / GPT / local LLMs depending on the data-residency constraint. Agents that take action, not chatbots that answer questions.

Computer vision + image ML

Drone-imagery analysis, manufacturing defect detection, document parsing. Vision AI is the studio's deepest capability — recent paid work for a listed Indian conglomerate validates it at production scale.

Local LLM deployment

Ollama + DeepSeek / Llama for on-prem or air-gapped contexts. India-resident data, edge-inference for latency-critical use cases, and a sub-cloud cost profile for high-volume internal tools.

Stack

The technical surface for this pillar.

  • Python · scikit-learn · PyTorch
  • Ollama · DeepSeek · Llama (local)
  • Claude · GPT (cloud)
  • Vision AI (YOLO · DINO · custom)
  • PostgreSQL · ClickHouse · BigQuery
  • dbt · Airflow · Dagster
  • Metabase · Superset · custom dashboards
  • Agent frameworks (custom · LangChain)

Typical engagement

What working with us on this pillar looks like.

Engagement shape
Discovery sprint (4 weeks, fixed) → build phase (project-shaped) → quarterly revenue-review retainer.
Typical duration
Discovery: 4 weeks. Build: 2–6 months. Quarterly retainer: ongoing.
Team commitment
1 strategy lead + 1 data engineer + 1 ML engineer during build. Throttled to 1 ML + 1 strategy on retainer.
IP & deliverables
Client owns the data, the trained models, the dashboards. SFHL retains rights to reusable agent frameworks, evaluation harnesses, and prompt-engineering libraries. Models trained on client data stay with the client.

Got a strategic growth problem we should look at?

First conversation is 30 minutes, founder-led, no funnel routing.