← All work

SFHL own SaaS · Nasscom-recognised deeptech · in active development

InfraOS — digitising the land lifecycle

InfraOS is SFHL's own deeptech SaaS — a GIS-based platform for the land-parcel lifecycle in Indian land-management contexts. Multi-stakeholder workflow, parcel-level audit trail, regulatory-compliance architecture. Selected by Nasscom for the Emerge 50 deeptech recognition track. Currently in active development.

  • GIS mapping
  • Multi-stakeholder workflow
  • Compliance-ready data model
  • Python · FastAPI
  • PostgreSQL · TimescaleDB
  • Docker

The problem

Indian land-records workflows are stitched together across siloed registries, paper-trail audits, manual GIS overlays, and financial reporting that doesn't map cleanly to land-asset accounting. The cost of a single error compounds across stakeholders for years. The deeptech opportunity: a single platform that holds the parcel as the unit of truth, with regulatory-compliance reporting designed in from the schema layer.

Our approach

We built InfraOS as a GIS-first SaaS — the parcel record carries spatial geometry, ownership history, encumbrances, and a compliance-ready data model that supports GAAP-style financial reporting once the product reaches that deployment stage. Multi-stakeholder workflow rules are configurable per state / authority. Audit trails are append-only and signed, designed for regulator inspection.

Outcome

Selected by Nasscom Emerge 50 for the deeptech recognition track. Platform is currently in active development — not yet a shipped commercial release. Conversations with state-government and industry partners are ongoing.

Related pillar

This engagement sits inside our Process Automation pillar.

Eliminate inefficiencies. We deploy internal positioning and logic flows to automate your operations.

Read the Process Automation pillar in detail

Disclosure

What this page does and doesn't say.

Public case-study copy describes the engagement at category level — what kind of problem we solved, what kind of platform we built, what kind of outcome it produced. It deliberately doesn't share deployment metrics, vendor partnerships, internal codenames, or specific architecture beyond what's required to evaluate fit.

On a signed NDA, in a first or second meeting, we'll share the depth — reference contacts, specific outcomes, and the architecture in detail. The first conversation is 30 minutes; reference setup happens after that.

Bring us a problem in the same shape.

Or a problem in a shape we haven't built yet. Both are interesting. The first conversation is 30 minutes, founder-led.